Writer of Wrongs

March 24, 2010

Twitter Reciprocity: Why it’s not always a good thing

Filed under: social media — Senobia Torres @ 12:55 pm
Tags: ,

By definition, social networking sites are designed to foster interaction between people who share the common interests. When you find a like-minded person who has some traits you admire, you shoot them a friend request so they can be a part of your elite circle. In the case of Twitter, you may start to “follow” them – as in their posts, not in a weird stalky kind of way.

People who have their own business or organization often participate in social networking sites with one goal in mind – to spread the word about their company or services. It’s not about making “friends”. It’s purely one more marketing tool in their virtual toolbox. Perfectly acceptable, not a thing wrong with that. If, of course, it’s done right.

And doing it right does not mean following random people for the sake of upping your “following/follower” numbers. It doesn’t mean just because someone follows you, that you have to respond in kind. In fact, it doesn’t even mean that you should.

In order for social networking to be an effective business tool, there does have to be some degree of reciprocity. It doesn’t have to be in the form of “You follow me and I’ll follow you”, however.  People have to be reading your postings, getting something from them, and hopefully passing them on for your postings to be doing anything for you. Your message won’t be reaching the masses via social networking if it’s falling on dead – or as in the case of yesterday’s blog entry – inactive ears.

One of the most unbelievable things I have found while doing research for these Twitter-related blog entries is that some accounts have three, four, and five thousand followers….without ever having tweeted their first tweet. They are perfect examples of the blind reciprocity theory. Once those lists get past a certain number of followers, they are no longer about being a marketing tool. They become mere status symbols – even if they are erroneous. Realistically, you cannot interact with thousands of people on a regular basis. And if you’re not interacting with your followers and the people you are following - or networking, as the sites intended – what good is it doing you to have them?

Here’s the short list of what to look for when deciding whether to reciprocate a following on Twitter.

1. Date of their last post – Was it a few days ago or some time last year?

2. A name with no recent post – These are the accounts that have never posted. Go check it out. Some of them have thousands of followers, but why? These are the accounts that will clutter up your lists and give the impression that you are more popular than you really are.

3. Content of their posts – Nobody likes high pressure sales tactics. We all have things we’re trying to market and sell, but it’s annoying to shove it down people’s throats constantly. If their entire page is full of sales fodder about their “new” or “improved” product, chances are that product is all they have to offer.

Happy tweeting!

March 23, 2010

Twitter Users: You’re not as popular as you may think

Filed under: social media — Senobia Torres @ 7:49 am
Tags:

Truthfully, when is the last time you sat down and sifted through the long list of followers you have amassed on Twitter? Checking the accounts one by one? When is the last time you sorted through the people you are following? What you find may surprise you.

Twitter, like most other social networking sites, is full of dormant accounts. People lose interest and walk away from them. Most of the time, they do so unnoticed. Chances are, some of these people were once your followers and vice versa. You may think you have two thousand followers and carry some degree of clout. You must, right? Two thousand people aren’t diggin’ your tweets for nothin’.

In reality, many of those “followers” haven’t been active on Twitter in months. This same reality applies to the people you are following. We get so caught up in the more prolific Twitter users that we lose sight of those who aren’t very posty. This gives us the impression that we’re more popular than we actually are.

Culling your follower and following list is a must-do for any Twitter user. Aside from giving you the chance to gauge your real popularity on the site, purging the inactive users from your list makes room for people who are actually reading and passing on your tweets.

Which is why you started tweeting in the first place, right?

March 17, 2010

When is the last time you wrote for you?

Filed under: freelance writing — Senobia Torres @ 12:22 am

As freelancers, we all get bogged down in the rut of, “Must write to survive”. That’s true – to a point, if freelance writing is your only source of income. It pays the bills, buys the groceries, and provides all the other needful things.

But what about other kinds of needful things? The need to escape every now and then to do something  just for you?

Tonight, while finishing up some projects with fast approaching deadlines, I stopped to ask myself when is the last time I wrote for me? I couldn’t remember! I had fallen in the rut of “Must write to survive” and totally forgotten why I started writing in the first place.

So I stopped what I was working on and went off in search of something to write “for me”.  Something. Anything. A long lost passion, a pet peeve, some random post on a website that accepts commentary.

Mine ended up being Spooftimes.  It allows me to do so many of the things I enjoy! Writing…researching current events…voicing my opinion…making fun of celebrity scapegoats..debunking nonsense theories. And! The whole idea is to do it with sarcasm! O, how I love sarcasm. It’s one of the very few things in life I have mastered the fine art of.

So..ask yourself when is the last time you wrote for you.

If you can’t recall, it’s been too long.

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.